| Peer-Reviewed

Biogas Production from Mixture of Fruit Peels Co-Digestion with Cattle Manure Under Anaerobic Condition

Received: 10 November 2021    Accepted: 25 November 2021    Published: 2 December 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Biogas is one of an alternative source of energy that is produced by methanogenic bacteria through the bio-degradation of organic material under anaerobic conditions. The aim of this study was to measure daily biogas production from mixture of fruit peels with cattle manure in solo and five mix ratios under anaerobic condition at 25°C using batch digestion under room temperature conditions (25ºC) using batch fermentation. In all treatments, parameters such as total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS), pH, organic carbon (%), total nitrogen and C:N ratio were measured before and after digestion. The daily biogas production was subsequently measured by water displacement method for 30 days. All measured of physico-chemical parameters of each substrate were significantly different among digesters before and after anaerobic digestion. Gas production was clearly observed in all of the substrates types starting from the fifth day of digestion and increase gradually and also decrease sequentially at the end in all substrates. Among all digesters, the one fed with 30% PM and 70% MFL was showed in the highest cumulative biogas and the lowest was recorded from 100% PM. The result suggested that mix ratio of the two substrates in 30% PM and 70% MFL was optimal for maximum biogas yield. Overall results indicate that the increment of biogas yield and VS, and TS reduction can be significantly enhanced when GM and WMP are co-digested. However, the quality of biogas produced was not subjected to be tested chromatographically in terms of the methane content.

Published in American Journal of Modern Energy (Volume 7, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajme.20210706.11
Page(s) 92-98
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Biogas, Methanogenic Bacteria, Co-digestion, Cattle Manure, Fermentation

References
[1] Akinbami, F. K. Ilori, M. O. Oyebisi, T. O. Akinwumi, I. O. and Adeoti, O. 2011. Biogas energy use in Nigeria: current status, future prospects and policy implications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 5: 97–112.
[2] American Public Health Association, 1999. Standard Method for the Examination of Water and Waste water 20th Edition. APHA. Washington.
[3] Animut Asefa. 2013. Enhancement of biogas production using chemical and thermal pre-treatments in the anaerobic co-digestion of cow dung and poultry litter in batch fermentation. An MSc Thesis Presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Haramaya University. Pp 62.
[4] Bekele Gadisa. 2011. Biogas production system design for condominium and its feasibility. M.Sc. Thesis Presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Addis Ababa University. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[5] Dawit Diriba. 2012. Assessment of Biomass Fuel Resource Potential and Utilization in Ethiopia: Sourcing Strategies for Renewable Energies, Department of Economics and Technological Change, Centre for development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, D-53113 Walter-Flex str. 3, Bonn, Germany, (2) 1.
[6] Devlin, D., Esteves, C. S. R. R., Dinsdale, R. M. and Guwy, A. J. 2011. The effect of acid pretreatment on the anaerobic digestion and dewatering of waste activated sludge Bioresource Technology. 102: 4076-4082.
[7] Getachew Eshete (ph D). Dr. K. S. F. H. 2006. Report on the feasibility study of the national programme for domestic biogas in Ethiopia, SNV Ethiopia.
[8] Gregor, D. Zupancic and Viktor Grilc. 2012. Anaerobic Treatment and Biogas Production from Organic Waste, Management of Organic Waste, ISBN: 978-953-307-925-7, In Tech: http://www.intechopen.com/books/management.
[9] Green, D. Nagata E. and Slotnick, J. 2004. World Energy Assessment. Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability Energy, the environment and health chapter 3, p 63-65.
[10] Harilal, S. Sorathia, Dr. Pravin, P. Rathod, Arvind, S. Sorathiya. 2012. Biogas generation and factors affecting the biogas generation. Address for Correspondence Department of Mechanical Engineering, Government Engineering College, Bhuj Kutch, Gujarat, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology. E-ISSN 0976-3945.
[11] Hossana Town Finance and Economic Development Office, 2018.
[12] Lo Niee Liew, B. S., 2011. Solid- State Anaerobic Digestion of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Biogas Production. An MSc Thesis Presented to the School of Graduate Studies of the Ohio State University. 44 pp.
[13] Marchaim, U. 1992. Biogas process for sustainable development. MIGAL Galilee Technological Center. Kiryatghmona Israel, FAO.
[14] Rafique, R. T. P. Gorm, A. Nizami, Z. Asam, D. M. Jerry and G. Kiely, 2010. Effect of thermal, chemical and thermo-chemical pre-treatments to enhance methane production. Energy. 35: 4556-4561.
[15] Sumesh, M. and Araro. 2011. Poultry Manure: The new Fronter for Anaerobic Digestion. Final Report January 6, 2011, S3N Consulting, LLC.
[16] Teodorita, Al Seadi, Dominik Rutz, Heinz Prassl, Michael Kottner, Tobias Finsterwalder, Silke Volk and Rainer Janssen. 2008. Biogas Handbook. Published by University of Southern Denmark Esbjerg, Niels Bohrs Vej 9-10.
[17] Tchobanoglous, G., Theisen, H. and Vigil, S. 1993. Integrated Solid Waste Management Engineering Principle and Management Issues, 2nd, McGraw-Hill ISBN-10: 0070632375 pp: 978.
[18] Wilkie, A. C. 2008. Bioenergy: Biomethane from biomass, Biowaste and Biofuel, J. Well et al. Washington DC, pp 195-199.
[19] World Bank, 2014. World Data Bank: Ethiopia. Retrieved January 13, 2014, from http://data.worldbank.org/country/ethiopia.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Desta Lamore Erebo. (2021). Biogas Production from Mixture of Fruit Peels Co-Digestion with Cattle Manure Under Anaerobic Condition. American Journal of Modern Energy, 7(6), 92-98. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajme.20210706.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Desta Lamore Erebo. Biogas Production from Mixture of Fruit Peels Co-Digestion with Cattle Manure Under Anaerobic Condition. Am. J. Mod. Energy 2021, 7(6), 92-98. doi: 10.11648/j.ajme.20210706.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Desta Lamore Erebo. Biogas Production from Mixture of Fruit Peels Co-Digestion with Cattle Manure Under Anaerobic Condition. Am J Mod Energy. 2021;7(6):92-98. doi: 10.11648/j.ajme.20210706.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajme.20210706.11,
      author = {Desta Lamore Erebo},
      title = {Biogas Production from Mixture of Fruit Peels Co-Digestion with Cattle Manure Under Anaerobic Condition},
      journal = {American Journal of Modern Energy},
      volume = {7},
      number = {6},
      pages = {92-98},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajme.20210706.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajme.20210706.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajme.20210706.11},
      abstract = {Biogas is one of an alternative source of energy that is produced by methanogenic bacteria through the bio-degradation of organic material under anaerobic conditions. The aim of this study was to measure daily biogas production from mixture of fruit peels with cattle manure in solo and five mix ratios under anaerobic condition at 25°C using batch digestion under room temperature conditions (25ºC) using batch fermentation. In all treatments, parameters such as total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS), pH, organic carbon (%), total nitrogen and C:N ratio were measured before and after digestion. The daily biogas production was subsequently measured by water displacement method for 30 days. All measured of physico-chemical parameters of each substrate were significantly different among digesters before and after anaerobic digestion. Gas production was clearly observed in all of the substrates types starting from the fifth day of digestion and increase gradually and also decrease sequentially at the end in all substrates. Among all digesters, the one fed with 30% PM and 70% MFL was showed in the highest cumulative biogas and the lowest was recorded from 100% PM. The result suggested that mix ratio of the two substrates in 30% PM and 70% MFL was optimal for maximum biogas yield. Overall results indicate that the increment of biogas yield and VS, and TS reduction can be significantly enhanced when GM and WMP are co-digested. However, the quality of biogas produced was not subjected to be tested chromatographically in terms of the methane content.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Biogas Production from Mixture of Fruit Peels Co-Digestion with Cattle Manure Under Anaerobic Condition
    AU  - Desta Lamore Erebo
    Y1  - 2021/12/02
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajme.20210706.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajme.20210706.11
    T2  - American Journal of Modern Energy
    JF  - American Journal of Modern Energy
    JO  - American Journal of Modern Energy
    SP  - 92
    EP  - 98
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-3797
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajme.20210706.11
    AB  - Biogas is one of an alternative source of energy that is produced by methanogenic bacteria through the bio-degradation of organic material under anaerobic conditions. The aim of this study was to measure daily biogas production from mixture of fruit peels with cattle manure in solo and five mix ratios under anaerobic condition at 25°C using batch digestion under room temperature conditions (25ºC) using batch fermentation. In all treatments, parameters such as total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS), pH, organic carbon (%), total nitrogen and C:N ratio were measured before and after digestion. The daily biogas production was subsequently measured by water displacement method for 30 days. All measured of physico-chemical parameters of each substrate were significantly different among digesters before and after anaerobic digestion. Gas production was clearly observed in all of the substrates types starting from the fifth day of digestion and increase gradually and also decrease sequentially at the end in all substrates. Among all digesters, the one fed with 30% PM and 70% MFL was showed in the highest cumulative biogas and the lowest was recorded from 100% PM. The result suggested that mix ratio of the two substrates in 30% PM and 70% MFL was optimal for maximum biogas yield. Overall results indicate that the increment of biogas yield and VS, and TS reduction can be significantly enhanced when GM and WMP are co-digested. However, the quality of biogas produced was not subjected to be tested chromatographically in terms of the methane content.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Biotechnology Department, Wachemo University, Hossana, Ethiopia

  • Sections